S
Scribeable
Pricing
Sign In
Home/Clinical calculators/Fuhrman/WHO-ISUP Nuclear Grade for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Clinical calculator · Urology

Fuhrman/WHO-ISUP Nuclear Grade for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Grades nuclear atypia in clear cell RCC to predict prognosis and guide surveillance intensity

Highest activation tier
Recommended
How it is scored
Scored in code; a stated value is compared only from the structured summary or a supplied value
Scoring type
classification
Care settings
Inpatient, Outpatient

When it activates

Scribeable activates a calculator from the encounter. The Fuhrman/WHO-ISUP Nuclear Grade for Renal Cell Carcinoma can activate when the transcript or pasted chart context documents any of these:

  • Renal cell carcinoma grading
  • RCC nuclear grade assignment
  • Kidney cancer pathology grading
  • Clear cell RCC prognosis
  • RCC surveillance planning

A coded diagnosis can also activate it. ICD-10 prefixes carried by the registry: C64.

Inputs the note needs

1 input. Each is resolved from the transcript, the pasted chart context and charted labs; at this calculator’s tier a missing input is never requested, and a missing required input keeps the score out of the draft.

InputTypeUnit / optionsGuidance
Fuhrman/WHO-ISUP nuclear grade (1-4)exam

Reference for licensed clinicians. Where the registry text carries dose thresholds or conversion factors, they are as published in the cited sources. This page is not a prescribing tool and not individualised medical advice; verify against a current drug reference and the current guideline before acting. Medical disclaimer.

Scoring

Grade 1: Small round uniform nuclei (~10 microns), inconspicuous/absent nucleoli. Grade 2: Slightly irregular nuclei (~15 microns) with nucleoli visible at 400x. Grade 3: Markedly irregular nuclei (~20 microns) with nucleoli prominent at 100x. Grade 4: Bizarre multilobed nuclei, heavy chromatin clumping, sarcomatoid/rhabdoid differentiation.

Interpretation

Grade 1: Excellent prognosis — 5-year CSS >95%. Active surveillance may be appropriate for small tumors. Grade 2: Good prognosis — 5-year CSS ~80-90%. Standard surveillance protocol. Grade 3: Intermediate prognosis — 5-year CSS ~60-70%. Enhanced surveillance, consider adjuvant therapy in clinical trials. Grade 4: Poor prognosis — 5-year CSS ~30-40%. Aggressive management, adjuvant immunotherapy (pembrolizumab for high-risk). WHO-ISUP grading (2012) replaced Fuhrman — based on nucleolar prominence, prognostically superior. Grade 4 includes any sarcomatoid or rhabdoid differentiation regardless of nucleoli.

Evidence

Sources carried in Scribeable's citation registry for this calculator; guideline version: Fuhrman 1982/WHO-ISUP 2012.

  • Fuhrman SA et al. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinomaFuhrman et al. (Nuclear Grading) 1982 · 1982 · link last verified 2026-03-28
  • Delahunt B et al. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for renal cell carcinoma and other prognostic parametersISUP (Renal Cell Grading) 2012 · 2012 · WHO/ISUP · Consensus · link last verified 2026-03-28

How Scribeable handles it in the note

When an encounter activates the Fuhrman/WHO-ISUP Nuclear Grade for Renal Cell Carcinoma (its highest tier is recommended), Scribeable does not ask you for missing inputs. The score is computed in code from whatever inputs resolve from the transcript, the pasted chart context or charted labs; a computed value is written into the draft only when every required input already resolves.

The score is computed in code from the resolved inputs, not recalled by the language model. A stated Fuhrman/WHO-ISUP Nuclear Grade for Renal Cell Carcinoma value is compared against the computed one when the draft's structured summary carries it; a disagreement found there is flagged to the second drafting pass, which is instructed to correct the score and its interpretation, unless Scribeable has supplied the computed value to that pass, in which case the value the draft writes is checked against the supplied one and a detected difference is shown beside the note for you to adjudicate rather than silently rewritten.

Classified as a staging or classification system: activated strictly, because a wrong stage on the wrong patient is a documentation hazard.

Related calculators

  • Gleason Score / ISUP Grade GroupGrades prostate cancer aggressiveness to guide treatment decisions and prognosis
  • PI-RADS (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System)Standardizes prostate MRI interpretation to guide biopsy decisions for clinically significant prostate cancer detection
  • BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System)Standardizes breast imaging assessment and management recommendations to ensure consistent reporting and follow-up
  • CTCAE Toxicity Grading (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events)Standardizes adverse event grading in oncology for treatment modification decisions
  • ECOG Performance StatusQuantifies functional status in cancer patients to guide treatment decisions, clinical trial eligibility, and prognosis
  • FIGO Staging for Gynecologic CancerStandardizes staging of gynecologic cancers (cervical, endometrial, ovarian, vulvar, vaginal) to guide treatment and determine prognosis

Can activate in: Urology, Oncology, Hematology, Pathology.

Scored in code

See it activate on your own encounter

14 days of full Pro. No sales call.

Start free trialHow calculator scoring works

14-day Pro trial with a card on file. $79/month starts 14 days after your trial begins unless you cancel first. Cancel any time from Settings > Billing.

S
Scribeable

Clinician-owned software for the doctor who still wants to be a doctor. Portable across every job you’ll ever have.

Product

  • Features
  • Rounding Mode
  • For Hospitalists
  • For Emergency Medicine
  • For Direct Primary Care
  • For Solo Providers
  • For Residents & Students
  • For Group Practices
  • For Telehealth
  • Pricing
  • Security
  • Health Systems & Hospitals
  • Documentation

Company

  • The Scribeable Method
  • Trust & Compliance
  • Transparency
  • Scribeable EMR (concept)
  • Clinician Guild
  • Reviews
  • Our Mission
  • About
  • Case Studies
  • Contact
  • ROI Calculator

Specialties

  • Internal Medicine
  • Primary Care
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Psychiatry
  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics
  • Cardiology
  • Urgent Care
  • All Specialties →

Compare

  • vs Dragon Copilot
  • vs Nabla
  • vs Abridge
  • vs DeepScribe
  • vs Suki
  • vs Heidi
  • Alternatives
  • AI Scribe Pricing
  • Pricing Transparency Index
  • Note Quality
  • All Comparisons →

Resources

  • Support
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Locations by State
  • Conditions
  • Clinical Calculator Registry
  • Procedures
  • EHR Integrations
  • Solutions
  • Status

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • BAA
  • DPA
  • Medical Disclaimer
  • Legal Hub

Capabilities

  • Rounding Mode
  • Referral Letters
  • Clinical Calculators
  • After Visit Summaries
  • Document Generation
  • Quality Reporting
  • HCC Coding
  • Template Marketplace

HIPAA

Compliant

SOC 2

Controls Implemented

BAA

Included

AES-256

Encryption

MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: Scribeable is a documentation tool, not a medical device. All AI-generated content must be reviewed and approved by licensed healthcare providers before use in patient care. Scribeable does not provide medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. See full Medical Disclaimer.

© 2026 Scribeable LLC All rights reserved.

US-Based Servers·GDPR Compliant·CCPA Compliant·Do Not Sell My Information·